Should we all become vegetarians? Essays -- essays research papers

Should all people become vegetarians ?As we elicit now observe, vegetarianism has become something fashionable, and the number of people who reject eating center is constantly increasing. In Britain, for instance, over 5 million people have done it so far. It is obviously connected with the recent animal diseases, but this disposal is likely to spread on the other regions of the world. However, it is not only a fashion or fear of illnesses. I myself became a vegetarian about 2 old age ago, and I burn down see a number of reasons why people should stop eating meat. They are mainly of ethic, economic and health type. Those who think in an ecological way should also be aware of how this meat consumption ruins our environment. I dont have an intention to force anybody to become a vegetarian, but I hope that my argumentation would be strong enough to make some people think about it, at least. In this adjudicate I will try to present this point of view, expressing my personal feeling s and showing scientific facts about the problem.Let me begin with the words by George Bernard Shaw Animals are my friends and I dont eat my friends. This indicates the ethic aspect of meat consumption. In fact, people often dont realize how animals are treated, but they can see commercial spots in their TV showing smiling pigs, cows or chickens, happy and ready to be eaten. My impression is that there cant be anything more cruel and senseless. It is no secret that animals suffer ...

Relationship between Hamlet and Rosencrantz Essay

Are there any acceptable reasons to lie to a friend? This question brings us to the issue of authorized friendship. In the play juncture, by William Shakespeargon, the race between Hamlet and Horatio as well as the blood between Hamlet with Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are presented. These relationships are portrayed by the occasion on which the friends meet, the method in which Hamlets friends treat him, and how they act towards him. From these incidents, Horatio proves to be a better friend to Hamlet than either Rosencrantz or Guildenstern.As the play develops, we see that Horatio treats Hamlet with more kindness than both Rosencrantz and Guildenstern. This is exemplified in Horatios actions in particular, his first meeting with Hamlet where he informed Hamlet ab forbidden his fathers ghost, then advised him not to follow the ghost, and helped him dress the mousetrap in fix to prove Claudius guilt in the gain of King Hamlet. In the beginning, after witnessing the appearance of King Hamlets ghost, Horatio informs Hamlet of what he saw. I think I saw your father yesternight. (I, ii, 188). The fact, that Horatio would tell his friend that he saw the ghost of his dead father every day for the stopping point week proved that Horatio cared for Hamlet. Next, Horatio tried to protect Hamlet by warning him of possible dangers that could arise if he followed his fathers ghost.Hamlet It will not speak, then I will follow itHoratio Do not, my lordWhat if it tempt you toward the flood, my lord,/ Or to the dreadful summit of the cliff. (I, iv, 62-63, 69-70)From this scene, Horatio is shown to be protecting Hamlet from dangers that could occur, an act that a true friend would carry out. Finally, Horatio helped Hamlet to perform the mousetrap in order to determine if Claudius really killed King Hamlet.Hamlet one scene of it comes approximately the circumstances which Hamlet have told Horatio of his fathers death Observe Claudius if his occulted guilt.Horatio well, my lord/ If Claudius steal aught the whilst this play is playing,/ And scape detecting, Horatio will pay the theft. (III, ii, 75-76,79, 87-88)In this act, Horatio has agree to team up with Hamlet, and defy his allegiance to the King of Denmark, to see if the Claudius killed King Hamlet. These events are evidence of the true friendship Horatio has with Hamlet.During the play, Hamlet is also introduced to his childhood friends Rosencrantz and Guildenstern. though they have known each other from a young age, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern prove not to be as true in their friendship to Hamlet as Horatio. This is evidenced by their reason come to Denmark, their first meeting with Hamlet, and the way in which they treated him. When Rosencrantz and Guildenstern arrive in Denmark they are welcomed by Claudius and Gertrude because they were sent for by the King and king. Welcome, dear Rosencrantz and Guildenstern The need we have to use you did provoke/ Our hasty sending. (II, ii, 1, 3-4). Si nce Rosencrantz and Guildenstern came to Denmark because they were called upon, and did not come on their own free will, this proves that they are not true friends to Hamlet. Next, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern agreed to Claudius and Gertrudes proposal to spy on Hamlet.Claudius and to gather, Whether aught to us unknown afflicts him thus,Guildenstern But we obey (II, ii, 15-18, 29)Since Rosencrantz and Guildenstern agreed to spy on Hamlet, their own friend, this reveals that they are not true friends. Finally, after Hamlet figured out that Rosencrantz and Guildenstern were sent to spy on him did they finally confess my Lord, we were sent for. (II, ii, 292). After the truth came out, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern tried to make Hamlet feel better because he felt that he was in a prison living in Denmark because the ghosttold Hamlet of his murder and the adulterous relationship Gertrude had with Claudius. From examining the events surrounding the relationships of Rosencrantz and Guilden stern with Hamlet, it is plain to see that they were not good friends to Hamlet.In comparing Rosencrantz and Guildenstern relationship with Hamlet to Horatios relationship with Hamlet, it is clear that Horatio was a better friend. From the initial meeting of the two sets of friends to how they treated the main character, Horatio proved to be kinder to Hamlet throughout. First of all, the fact that Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are called to Denmark by the King and Queen and did not come because they wanted to see their friend is very telling of the level of friendship they have with Hamlet. This is unlike Horatio, who goes out and seeks Hamlet in order to tell him about his father. Secondly, Hamlet shows his trust towards Horatio when he indulges his plan to figure out if Claudius killed his father.This is in contrast to Rosencrantz and Guildenstern who agreed to help Claudius figure out what was terms with Hamlet. Finally, Horatio wanted to protect Hamlet from dangers when he warne d him that something negative could possibly happen if he followed the ghost. Rosencrantz and Guildenstern only acted nicely to Hamlet once he figured out that they were sent to spy on him. These events provide evidence that Horatio was a better friend to Hamlet than Rosencrantz and Guildenstern were.In conclusion, from comparing the relationship between Rosencrantz and Guildenstern with Hamlet versus the relationship of Horatio with Hamlet, the evidence viewed, such as his first encounter with Hamlet, the way the main character is treated, and how the friends act with him, showed that Horatio was a true friend to Hamlet. Though, a person whitethorn make many friends throughout their lifetime, their actions provide the evidence that is used to determine who are in fact true friends.

The Best of Times the Worst of Times

Comfort women were women and girls forced into a prostitution corps created by the Empire of Japan. 1 The figure of speech sympathizer women is a translation of a Japanese name ianfu ( ). 23 Ianfu is a euphemism for shofu ( ) whose meaning is prostitute(s). 4 The earliest reporting on the issue in siemens Korea stated it was not a voluntary force,5 and since 1989 a number of women have come forward testifying they were kidnapped by Imperial Japanese soldiers. Historians such as downwind Yeong-Hun6 and Ikuhiko Hata stated the recruitment of comfort women was voluntary. 7 Other historians, using the testimony of ex-comfort women and surviving Japanese soldiers have argued the Imperial Japanese Army and Navy were each instantaneously or indirectly involved in coercing, deceiving, luring, and sometimes kidnapping four-year-old women throughout Japans occupied territories. 8 Estimates vary as to how many women were involved, with numbers ranging from as first base as 20,000 from s ome Japanese scholars9 to as high as 410,000 from some Chinese scholars,10 but the exact numbers are still cosmos researched and debated.A volume of the women were from Korea, China, Japan and the Philippines,11 although women from Thailand, Vietnam, Malaysia, Taiwan, Indonesia and other Japanese-occupied territories were used for military comfort stations. Stations were located in Japan, China, the Philippines, Indonesia, then Malaya, Thailand, Burma, New Guinea, Hong Kong, Macau, and French Indochina. 12 According to testimony, young women from countries at a lower place Japanese Imperial control were abducted from their homes.In many cases, women were also lured with promises of work in factories or restaurants. Once recruited, the women were incarcerated in comfort stations in unconnected lands. 13 A Dutch government study described how the Japanese military itself recruited women by force in the Dutch East Indies. 14 It revealed that a total of ccc Dutch women had been coer ced into Japanese military sex slavery15The Best of Times the Worst of TimesComfort women were women and girls forced into a prostitution corps created by the Empire of Japan. 1 The name comfort women is a translation of a Japanese name ianfu ( ). 23 Ianfu is a euphemism for shofu ( ) whose meaning is prostitute(s). 4 The earliest reporting on the issue in South Korea stated it was not a voluntary force,5 and since 1989 a number of women have come forward testifying they were kidnapped by Imperial Japanese soldiers. Historians such as Lee Yeong-Hun6 and Ikuhiko Hata stated the recruitment of comfort women was voluntary. 7 Other historians, using the testimony of ex-comfort women and surviving Japanese soldiers have argued the Imperial Japanese Army and Navy were either directly or indirectly involved in coercing, deceiving, luring, and sometimes kidnapping young women throughout Japans occupied territories. 8 Estimates vary as to how many women were involved, with numbers ranging fr om as low as 20,000 from some Japanese scholars9 to as high as 410,000 from some Chinese scholars,10 but the exact numbers are still being researched and debated.A majority of the women were from Korea, China, Japan and the Philippines,11 although women from Thailand, Vietnam, Malaysia, Taiwan, Indonesia and other Japanese-occupied territories were used for military comfort stations. Stations were located in Japan, China, the Philippines, Indonesia, then Malaya, Thailand, Burma, New Guinea, Hong Kong, Macau, and French Indochina. 12 According to testimony, young women from countries under Japanese Imperial control were abducted from their homes.In many cases, women were also lured with promises of work in factories or restaurants. Once recruited, the women were incarcerated in comfort stations in foreign lands. 13 A Dutch government study described how the Japanese military itself recruited women by force in the Dutch East Indies. 14 It revealed that a total of 300 Dutch women had b een coerced into Japanese military sex slavery15

Expository Essay on the Life Essay

denim Little was born in Taiwan in 1932 but grew up in Ontario, Canada. She was born with a serious eye disease and her vision is severely impaired. Though she has overcome this handicap and become a successful childrens pen, it is clear that as a child, she must stand suffered ridicule and mockery from former(a) children in school and other places. She was different. Many times, children with disabilities ar more new than normal kids. They quickly learn that theyre different. They learn firsthand how cruel their peers can be if they look or act differently. They spend uneasy nights instant(a) themselves to sleep.The things that happen to us during those young years we spend in grade school often affect how we live our lives and what type of people we become. Everyone can bring forward a memory from their childhood, a moment when they were chosen for a sport or not chosen. A moment when they were honored for some accomplishment or laughed at for some misspoken word. Committing some sin such as passing gas while giving a book report in take c ar of the class can scar a child for life. These are the types of incidents that can turn an 8-year old boy into an extreme introvert. Or the class clown, depending upon how the child chooses to hand out with the mishap.I believe that this author plays out her painful childhood on the pages of these childrens novels, but unlike her real life, always with a happy ending. In her stories, the children and the adults are kind and understanding. Theyre compassionate folks who care and want to help. This is of course a stark contrast to what life is really like in the twenty-first century. Jean Little also develops stories that contain strong bonds between animals and humans, leading one to think that she may have turned away from friendships with other kids her age and instead chosen relationships with animals.Animals are non-judgmental. One thing about your dog hell always love you no matter what you look like. Your g oof doesnt care if youve got a playny looking nose or acne. Many lonely people find lifelong friendships with a parrot. Our pets give us unconditional love, something you rarely bring out from humans even under the best circumstances. Jean Littles parents were both doctors and probably made every bm to make sure that their daughter grew up as normally as possible. Having doctors as parents certainly afforded her all the best medical attention.But theres no medicine for an injured self-image. In her books, Jean also look fors strong family relationships. The homes and families in her books are happy and well-rounded, which leads one to think that her parents might have over-protected her. maybe they knew of the cruelty of grade-school children and wanted to build a wall around their daughter to keep her from harm. That would be a normal reaction for parents of a handicapped child. A handicapped child still sees the mockery from other students. They still hear the snickering and laughter.They hide these violations in their hearts and silently suffer. Often, the wounds are deep and the scars dont heal. In our society, especially in recent years, children who have suffered such abuse from their peers have gone on to formulate well-thought-out plans for revenge, as in the Littleton, Colorado school shootings. Theyve bought guns and special clothing in their crusade against the cruelty of fellow classmates. http//www. cnn. com/SPECIALS/2000/columbine. cd/frameset. exclude. html So many times, these situations have gone unnoticed until it was too late.In recent years, the lives of teachers and students have been needlessly lost because adults have failed to realize how important, how critical it is for children to feel as if they fit in. Jean Little has taken her hurt and abjection and turned it into uplifting literature for children. Though she too suffered verbal abuse and rejection because she was different, she takes her painful childhood and uses it to bu ild great literature for kids. In her book, soul Elses Summer, two 11 year-old girls find themselves being sent off for a long summer vacation in places where they dont want to be.Samantha is an athletic girl, being sent to stay with her grandmothers friend who runs a book store. She dreads discharge and daydreams of how boring it will be to be stuck all summer with a bunch of dusty old books. Alex is a quiet girl who loves to read. Shes is being sent to a supply rear for the summer. She is horrified to think of interacting with livestock, of getting dirty and sweaty. There will be bugs and spiders and shes scared of what else might be found on a horse farm. These two children meet on an Air Canada flight and quickly become friends. As they talk, one of them comes up with a crazy idea. What if they traded places?I believe the author sees herself as both of these characters a quiet girl who loves to stay indoors with her pets and her parents. But also, if only in her 11-year old imagination, this author sees herself as an outdoor type, adequate to hike through the woods, ride horses, and do all the other things that a normal child might do. Activities that Jean Little was never able to applaud because of her blindness. In Somebody Elses Summer Jean Little explores the idea of trading places. As a little girl, she may have daydreamed of becoming mortal else, mortal with healthy, normal eyes. Someone who could do all the things the other kids could do.If you read this book without knowing anything about this author, you think of it as a delightful childrens storymaybe something along the lines of The Parent Trap, an amusing tale of two kids having a summer they will never forget. Theres fun and frivolity as the girls set about taking up each others identity. Can they pull it off? Or will they be caught and punished? This is a charming story that any ten or twelve year old girl would enjoy reading. But if you read Jean Littles biography, you quickly realiz e that she builds the story around her own reality and the life that she always dreamed of having.She is both characters and the story allows her the opportunity to explore the life she could never have. Of course she enjoyed the life she had with her parents growing up. She loved them. She loved her books and her pets. But she has spent her life having to say no to rock climbing, sky diving, canoeing, arena tripsfun adventures that most of us take for granted. Still she dreams. She dreams of being someone else. Many handicapped children dream of being someone else. Someone healthy. They dream of going on all the adventures so-called normal children can go on. All kids want to be liked. They want to be popular.They need to be included. Handicapped children are no different. They have the same hopes and dreams that any other child has. Its very important that they feel like part of the group. http//www. hcaserves. com When you read Somebody Elses Summer knowing something about the a uthor herself, youre thankful that she was able to find a creative outlet for the cruel mockery she must have endured as a blind child. If she had not had the loving support of concerned parents, if she had not had a dog who loved her no matter what, her talent as a childrens author might never have developed and come to the surface.As compassionate human beings, we all love to see someone turn adversity into opportunity. We love seeing the underdog triumph. It gives us a wonderful feeling in our hearts. It reinforces what it is to be human in each of us when we see someone overcome difficulty or hardship to make something of themselves. In Jean Littles literature and in her life, we see a woman of courage who has achieved success in spite of her physicaland emotional, hardships. Jean takes the lemons that life has dealt her and makes a very fineand successful, lemonade stand.In her stories we can look at the orb thru the eyes of an 11 year-old. We can see a hopeful future. She re minds us to focus on the positive things in this life. For a few moments, we are taken away from the cruelty of reality and transported to her world a world where people accept you for who you are, a world where your physical appearance doesnt matter. In her world, strangers are kind and helpful and the problems of life amount to no more than what we will have for lunch. Or what game we shall play next.Works Cited CNN Website. May 1999 http//www.hcaserves.com

Assess Whether Religious Experience Demonstrates the Existence of God Essay

Religious recognize can be dissected into antithetical varieties. Alvin Plantinga repugnd that everyday experiences much(prenominal) as the sun rising should constitute as a sacred experience as the sun rising is so inspirational and conjures up ghostly belief out of awe. Some would argue that miracles or terrific occurrences atomic number 18 proof of graven images existence. If one was to view a man turning water into wine one would see it as impressive and possible cause spectral belief. Both miracles and everyday occurrences are public experiences as they can be witnessed by anyone however there are to a greater extent private/somebodyal religious experiences. Dreams and visions, such as St. Paul on the road to Damascus (where he heard the voice of Jesus), only apply to the person visualising them. These are overly used as religious experiences if you heard the voice of Jesus it would frankly be trusted a religious event.There is withal the on-going intenting that paragon is around you, he is guiding you through life, and this again is indescribable exactly rational justifi cronkion for the theist as it connects to the idea of perfections omnipresence. Fin all(prenominal)y there are also mystical experience as William James explained them these are ineffable (cannot be put into words) transient (very penetrative experience still not necessarily a long experience, the effects however can last a lifetime) passive (cannot be controlled by the recipient) experiences that are simply indescribable. Rudolf Otto described mystical experiences as numinous this is the feeling of awe and wonder when confronted with the divinity that is God numinous experiences are one of terrifying and make mystery. Should religious experiences be the basis of Gods existence or are they simply anomalous events that are importless.David Hume and A.J. Ayer are well lie withn empiricists. They would argue that unless something empirically verified it should not b e deemed meaningful so if I was to see God that should be seen as meaningful as it is empirically verified. If I were to see a cat walking across a street I would think to myself that is a cat, no surmise would enter my bear in mind I would simply establish that a cat was walking across a street. When one sees/experiences God why the same sort of logic should not be applied is ridiculous. If I were to see God I would think that is God no questions asked. Visions of God and miracles are empirically verifiable religious experiences, Hume and Ayer cannot dismiss these as that would be contradictory to their well established beliefs, thus empirically verified religious experiences can be used a fitting justification for Gods existence. The sceptics retort to this descent is how can we trust our empirical methods of justification.One could be hallucinating, the only reason St. Paul saw God was because he was deprived of water and had social pressures from the rising Christian religi on. A.J. Ayer noted that a straight stick appears bent in water, if our senses can deceive us once they will deceive us again, we cannot trust empirical evidence therefore it cannot be used as justification for a religious experience and definitely cannot be used to justify Gods existence. as well as what if the subject of supposed religious experience has taken some sort of mind altering drug surely then(prenominal) empirical evidence cannot be used to justify any sort of vision. Finally the sceptic would note that a religious experience is not an intermediate experience, one sees trees everyday but experiencing God is quite different. As philosophers we must view these exceptional experiences differently and be more analytical into the causes (such as looking at the recipient of the experience).In Brian Davies book An Introduction to the Philosophy of Religion he highlights that to slump empirical evidence without any major reason to doubt is simply absurd. He says that if on e is of sound mind, has good eyesight and is of reasonable intelligence unless then there isnt really any reason to doubt yourself, we use empirical evidence to make everyday assertions therefore it should be no different when seeing God, He also highlights that if it is possible to hallucinate it is also possible to see correctly, although this sounds very basic it does reject the argument from illusion (used by most sceptics to doubt sense data).Sure we can see things that arent really there but most of the time we are not hallucinating. Brian Davies also uses the example of a man called Fred. He states that Fred is as mad as a hatter and as drunk as a Lord Fred also regularly hallucinates and because of this not many people listen to what he has to say. Despite Fred perpetual hallucinations it is not right to say that everything he says is wrong, sometimes he could be telling the truth. Davies concludes that the fact that some people are prone to lodge things wrong is not a suff icient reason for another(prenominal)s to suppose that they always get things wrongBehold the Lord our God has shown us his glory and greatness, and we have his voice we have this day seen God speak with man and man salvage live This was taken from the Old Testaments book of Deuteronomy. Religious experience is not a contemporary miracle but one of great age, we all believe in gravity yet this has only been apparent for 300 years, yet something that has been around for millenniums is still questioned. These sightings of God have been continuous since early Christianity and Judaism in the beginning that. This is not an argument about the verifiability of religious experience but simply highlights the possibility of experiencing God and also its importance in justifying the existence of God. This is the argument of deception Baillie he argued that religious experience is not just justification for Gods existence but the ultimate justification. Sceptics would reply how do you know i t is God? How do you know you did not simply see and old man with a beard?Unless you have seen God before you do not know what he/she looks like. Some would argue that you need an agreed method of identifying God, if no such method has been agreed then you cannot truly say you have seen God. Also if God is transcendent of humans and surpasses them in every way then surely we cannot relate to him/her. We dont even know if God is a physical entity to be seen. Brian Davies response to the sceptics argument is despite not having an identification method that is inconsequential, something may be the case even though it does not conform to the testing method, mortal can still be intelligent despite getting a U in all their exams.A religious experience can still be justification for Gods existence despite not being satisfying any a priori testing method. John Hick presented the argument that our interpretations of events all differ. This dismisses the sceptics claim that there should be s ome sort of testing method about justifying religious experience. A person may claim to have seen God where as another might argue they have seen the devil, as some(prenominal) are basing this experience on a personal a priori perception of God/Devil it means that if these predetermined perceptions are different they are obviously going to disagree. William James argued that religious experience is extremely personal therefore it means different things to different people.Richard Swinburne and William Alston put forward the argument from credulity. Swinburne argued that if one has seen God one has sufficient justification to believe in God. Unless there is something manipulating this experience there is no reason to doubt a religious experience. Until your religious experience is disproven (through suspicion of evidence such as one was on drugs) then it can and should be used as justification for Gods existence. William Alston proclaimed a similar argument to Swinburnes arguments f rom credulity. He said people sometimes do perceive God and thereby acquire justified beliefs about God. He likewise believed that religious experience can be used a justification for Gods existence.He said justification about God is major facie this means one is justified in supposing unless there are strong enough reasons to the contrary. Both argued the religious experience should be innocent until proven guilty. A sceptics retort to Alston and Swinburne would be one should always doubt. Like mentioned earlier one could be subject to hallucination, we could be seeing God when he/she is not really there, you could be of total sound mind however you have a random hallucination due to water deprivation meaning you see God. How can we truly know that our subconscious is not malicious concocting mad religious visions? This is why the sceptic would always argue that we should always be doubtful they argue that religious experiences are not indubitable.Richard Swinburne not only propo sed arguments from credulity but also arguments from testimony. Swinburne stated that unless you have sufficient reasons to doubt someone claim of religious experience you should consider it true, if a person states they have seen God you have and you have no reason not to believe them you should consider their experience as true. Brian Davies gives the example of a group of adventurers who see a cat in the Amazon rainforest they go home and tell their explorer buddies they saw a cat in the Amazon rainforest. If a second group of explorers go to the Amazon rainforest and do not see a cat, does that mean the first group were wrong?Of course not Swinburne would argue you should believe the first group of explorers are there is no reason to doubt their word. The sceptics reply would be why trust the explorers? There could be social/professional pressures meaning they lied about seeing a cat because they thought it would be beneficial or because they felt pressurised by the group aroun d them, also there could be irregularities with their testimony, maybe all cats in the world are extinct so seeing a cat is very unlikely, or what if one of the explorers said they saw a black cat and another thought they saw a ginger cat.Brain Davies responds to this by noting that people interpret things in different ways (an argument used by the sceptics), two people may see a red Ferrari one may argue that it is an ugly car where as the other could argue it is a beautiful piece of machinery, they have both seen a car yet have different views/interpretations of what they have seen. So two people may both have seen God however one may think it was God the other might think it was the Devil. Therefore to say there are problems with a testimony because of different interpretations is absurd because the fact is God was there. One can perceive God in as many ways as they necessity it does not matter the only thing that matters is God was there.Religious experience can be used for rel igious conversion and religious belief but not necessarily for the existence of God. If one believes they have seen God and as a result of this vision they believe in the existence of God that is fine, but that doesnt necessarily mean God exists from a philosophical perspective. As the sceptic would regularly point out there are many other factors that may have influenced the subject who viewed God (such a water deprivation or drug consumption) however on an ordinary basis I feel that a vision of God or some kind of numinous experience is sufficient justification for the existence of God and religious belief. On an ordinary level religious experience can justify the existence of God but on a philosophical level it cannot, one cannot claim religious experience to be an objective truth in philosophy, but in ordinary life it is a personal matter and provides justification for Gods existence on a personal level.This is similar to what William James said in his work Varieties of Religiou s Experience he believed that religious experience was a very personal matter and is impossible to verbalise but can be used as self justification for Gods existence. He also stated that philosophy is useless in trying to prove a religion true but can show up obvious errors. One must also note that Swinburne, Alston and Davies arguments are not really proving the credibility of religious experience but simply defending it against sceptics attack. Personally I feel this is fine, why should the recipient of a religious experiences have to prove themselves, however I do feel some of Swinburnes and Davies arguments to defend religious experience are not sufficient. To conclude I feel the sceptics are right in dismissing religious experience on a philosophical level, but as many previous philosophers have highlighted (such as G.E.Moore) scepticism cannot be applied to ordinary life.

Touchstone anthology of contemporary creative nonfiction Essay

Comparative essay assignmentIntroduction In the Trenches written by Charles Yale Harrison and This Is Not Who We Are written by Naomi Shihab are two incompatible pieces of work which outline almost the same message. The analysis of these two stories differs in different focuss such as application of styles, pennings and imagery as articulated in each of the writings. Both contexts give a explanation about the fact of state of wars in the twentieth century in America but in different parts. In the trenches which are written by Canadian writer Charles Yale Harrison is a study about the Canadian war which starts in Monreal, a place where an unidentified pass who is twenty years old is together with Canadian soldiers ruleulating to institute up the Germans in Belgium and France. In this writing, a appall and realistic portrayal is set forth in an antiwar statement. This story is expressed from the first person point of flavor of a soldier who is in a trench. The writer begi ns the story by describing his close relationship with his fellow soldiers Anderson, Brown, Broadbent and Cleary and then shifts to the scenes of the infamous World War 1 trenches whereby the contains are filthy and the soldiers are continually exposed to the flesh-looting rainfalls, lice and huge rats (Harrison, 2002). However, Naomi Shihab, Arab-American poet is the writer of This is not who we are which is almost similar to the in the trenches although the writer of this story visualize it in form of a poem. This story begins with the writers personal life who seek relative safety in the American southwest which is a place torn by war. She describes her marital and emotional connection to Palestine since this is her ancestral homeland. The writer offers evidence of life in safer environment which she feels the disgrace of creation an Arab in America at a time when every Arab is considered suspect, including her (Nye, 1997). Nevertheless, the introduction of these two stories b rings a purview on what the entire story is all about. The ideas betwixt the two stories are presented in a different way depending on the kind of structure and form of each author. Therefore both contain different or similar themes, styles and literary devices in delivering the message which the author wants to communicate.Styles Both stories have employed styles in communicating the message to the targeted audience in form of simile, metaphor, personification and imagery. Similes is the main style applied in both contexts, Naomi Shihab, the writer of This is not who we are begins by describing Arab-American skillful violinist as a chic man who dresses decorous black suits and white shirts and plays like an angel. The writer adds that she wish for world symbols rather than the expensive American vehicles which wear American flags like hula-hula skirts. This shows how she wished that the war could end rather than being prosperous and rich in a violent land. Moreover, the writer proceeds to describe the world that she wished to be and in that location is application of another simile when she states that she can treasure the welcoming world of women, smiling, nurturing, fixing, tending and wrapping language around one another like a warm cloak. Similarly, Charles Yale Harrison has also applied similes in his writing when he was in the trench and states that he seen the whole army of wire posts beginning to relocation like a silent host towards him (Harrison, 2002). As the condition of war worsens, the writer depicts the boys who were in firing-step saying that they were like dead men. In addition, as the soldiers struggles in the dirt trench to save their lives, the writer applies simile by stating that they try to hideaway into the ground like frightened rats. However, Charles Yale Harrison describes the red-tailed comets which were sent by the Germans as looking at pretty like the fireworks they have left in Monreal adding that the sky is lit by hundre ds of extravagant fireworks like a night carnival which sounds very ironical. During the appendage of protecting themselves from the explosives, the writer illustrate using a simile stating that the soldiers thrown their faces downward on the bottom of the grovel and trench like savages before that berserk havoc. The application of similes in these two stories helps the audience to generate a kind of comparison which improves the understanding of what is going on. Moreover, metaphors and imagery has been applied in these two stories. Naomi Shihab (1997) describes the terrorist as men with hard faces who do vicious things. Although the terrorists are Arabs, the writer does not refer them as Arabs since she is one of them and wants to show that all Arabs are not terrorists. The demeanor of men with the hard faces causes the writer to defend herself and her people against the idea that she is one of those with hard faces who choose fierceness over words. This demonstration serves a major squeeze of explaining that blaming all Arabs because of behavior of the few terrorists is unfair. The writer states a story about a gentleman who approaches her this makes her afraid because she a half Arab thus this makes her to be momentarily tongue-tied but later finds her voice. Correspondingly, Harrison applies much of imagery and metaphors while describing the nature of the trench during war. He states that the trench is unsanitary due to the presence of mud, huge rats, flesh-rotting rainfalls and lice (Reid, 2004). The condition of the trench does not keep soldiers comfortable since they struggle to protect themselves from explosives of their enemies yet the place they are hiding is not safe. This story is distressing and upsetting illume the certainties of war through the eyes of a young soldier and the impressions they fragment.Themes Theme of war is general from both stories since the principal message is about the occurrence of war. This theme develops strongly in In the Trenches written by Charles Yale Harrison, war between his fellow soldiers and the Europeans begins from the first line up to the last line. According to the writer, the war is horrifying and we find a sense of shock at the cruelty of war which alters depression to the soldiers. Charles Yale Harrisons memoir leads us to wonder about why military man continue to retort to war in response to worldwide clashes while being fully conscious of its ferocity (Williford and Martone, 2007). The writer states how one of his fellow soldier said loudly as they argue that no wonder they are losing the bloody war. Moreover, the writer keeps stating that so this is war in many parts of the story thus depicting that the war is occurring. Conversely, Naomi Shihab describes the theme of war in form of terrorism which is caused by the men with hard faces. She describes his ancestral land as a place torn by war, (Williford &Martone, 51). This can evidently show the presence of war when she was writing this story. However, theme of crucifixion is another theme which has been described in both pieces of writing. Harrison begins describing the theme of suffering by describing how his friend by the name Fry suffers with his feet, as he keeps sliding into holes and creeping out, all the way up. The writer adds that he can hear his friend coughing and panting behind him. In addition the writer states that his nose is bleeding from the force of the detonations (Reid, 2004). Generally, Harrison gives description on how they are affected by the conditions of the trench as they try to protect themselves from the explosives this brings the theme of suffering plainly. Similarly, Naomi Shihab states that she cannot forget the fate of the people who suffer the quotidian indignities of surviving in a world at war, of persistent pain caused by the men with hard faces. In addition the writer says that she hold in heart so many distressed individuals because all friends and families of i nnocent victims affected by war are everywhere. This means that there were many people suffering due to the violence which was happening (Nye, 1997).Conclusion Generally, by comparing the two pieces of writing, I can conclude that they portray the same message but in a different manner and style because both stories focuses heavily on the conceit of war and violence in relation to the society. Harrison brings a clear perspective of the soldiers who were simply unexperienced youths, fighting ineffectively for meaningless ideals. Naomi Shihab brings a general explanation that blaming all Arabs for behavior of the few terrorists is absolute unfair. Both stories shape the future altitudes to war and develop a strong enthusiasm to the audience.ReferencesHarrison, C. (2002). Generals die in bed. Toronto Annick Press.Nye, N. (1997). Habibi. New York Simon & Schuster Books for Young Readers.Reid, J. H. (2004). Award-winning films of the 1930s From Wings to Gone with the wind the definitive guide. Morrisville, NC kayo Press.The Canadian republic magazine. (1929). Montreal s.n.Williford, L., & Martone, M. (2007). Touchstone anthology of contemporary creative nonfiction. New York Simon & Schuster.Source document

Effective Study Skills are the Sole Foundation of a Sound Education Essay

This essay intends to discuss whether good study skills are the sole foundation to a sound education. A helpful start is to movement to understand what is meant by the term study skills. Wikipedia (2014) defines study skills as techniques to assess the individual to be an effective learner and suggests that any skill which boosts a students mightiness to study and pass exams fucking be termed as a study skill. The word, skill, is further explained by Cottrell (2013) as a learned activity, something that give the sack be develop through practice. This suggests that anyone can successfully achieve a sound level of education. If skills such as time management, research skills, written skills and people skills can be learned, then perhaps everyone has the equal chance of success in their chosen topic of study. The C.R.E.A.M. Strategy for schooling (Cottrell 2013) allows us to build further on the field of study skills by looking at the learning process and breaking it down into f our areas. It is then easy to see where individual study skills can be applied in the learning process.The acronym C.R.E.A.M. Stands for C creative, R reflective, E effective, A active, M- motivation. Looking into each of these areas in more depth may conk out the student opportunity to examine the factors that may influence the learning process and be able to focus on, develop and apply the skills and strategies that they might find or so effective. At the same time, weakness that may hinder the learning process, could be identified and dealt with. It seems to suggest that study skills and strategies can be taught, learned and implemented by any individual, so allowing anyone to gain a sound education by using these learned skills. However, there are many factors that may hard influence the teaching and learning ofthese study skills in the first place, so affecting the implementation of the skills in order to succeed in education. Taylor (2014) believes that in order for a student to learn there, are several factors that must be considered.Most of these factors are external. Indeed, Mondal (2014) tell us there are seven factors that may influence a student The intellectual factor ie. (i)the individuals intelligence level (ii)learning factors such as poor or faultyteaching or learning methods (iii)physical factors eg. physical development or defects, sensory defects or general ill health (iv)mental factors especially attitude (v)emotional and social factors such as instincts, emotions, cooperation or argument(vi)teachers personality (vii)environmental factors for example, physical conditions at home or place of study.These factors go some way to identifying what may affect the way in which study skills can be learned and used effectively and of course many more could be mentioned too such as cultural and economic factors. In conclusion, effective study skills are vital for the development and continuing success in the education of an individual. Howe ver, the successful learning and implementation of these skills can be so heavily influenced by an abundance of outside factors, that it would be difficult to ultimately say that effective study skills are the sole foundation of a sound education.ReferencesCottrell, S. (2013). The take apart Skills Handbook, 4th Edition, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke Mondal, P. (2014). http//www.yourarticlelibrary.com/learning 21 March 2014 Taylor, D (January 2014). Factors That influence Student Learning, http//www.educationspace360.com/index.php/factors_that_influence_student_learning, 21 March 2014 http//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/study_skills 20 March 2014